Misleading or confusing license infos

At first I absolutely understand, that there is a paid license model to earn some money and it’s OK. But the current situation is somehow misleading.

  • According to the LICENSE file, Yaak is MIT licensed (free of charge).

  • According to the releases page on Github, a paid license is needed when using the prebuilt binaries.

  • According to the source code a paid license is needed “if you use Yaak within a for-profit organization of two or more people”

After ready all of this, it’s still OK but it’s a too long way to get there and at least this might be confusing for some users.

Maybe it’s possible to make this more clear on a single location and reference it from all the other places.

Please authenticate to join the conversation.

Upvoters
Status

Released

Board

Feedback

Date

Over 1 year ago

Author

Michael Richter

Subscribe to post

Get notified by email when there are changes.